Facebook is Under Fire Again

The U.K. Parliament showed internal Facebook Inc. $FB emails that show Mark Zuckerberg and other executives discussing rough tactics to kick out competitors, and also talking about possibilities for monetizing the massive amounts of users’ data that was collected by the company.

This documents proved that Facebook gave special access to that data to third-party companies, such as Lyft, Airbnb, and Netflix, and charged them for this info.That was a huge step away from privacy policy. The emails also reveal that Mr. Zuckerberg, who has a background as an engineer and software, participated in business decisions at Facebook while its growth. The documents suggest that Facebook “whitelisted” certain outside companies so they could, in fact, see this data, after it changed its Graph API.


“It is clear that increasing revenues from major app developers was one of the key drivers behind the Platform 3.0 changes at Facebook,” the Committee’s report says about Facebook’s decision to end developer access to the friends’ data API. “The idea of linking access to friends data to the financial value of the developers’ relationship with Facebook is a recurring feature of the documents.”

In a statement posted to Facebook corporate website, Facebook said, “There is an important distinction between friends’ data and friend lists.”

“In some situations, when necessary, we allowed developers to access a list of the users’ friends. This was not friends’ private information but a list of your friends (name and profile pic),” the statement said.

Many of the emails aren’t clear and it’s too early to make a conclusion. But the documents may bring new problems for the company as it faces a range of regulatory inquiries on both sides of the Atlantic into how it safeguards user privacy, treats its competitors and controls access to its platform.


“Like any organization, we had a lot of internal discussion and people raised different ideas. Ultimately, we decided on a model where we continued to provide the developer platform for free and developers could choose to buy ads if they wanted. This model has worked well.”

Said  Zuckerberg, on the Facebook post on Wednesday.

The CEO said that a lot of that changes were based in the company’s attempts in 2014 and 2015 to get rid of  “sketchy” apps, as well as building a business that can bring profit and be sustainable.

The 250 pages of documents were published on Wednesday as part of parliamentary procedures in the U.K. as lawmakers there examined Facebook’s use of data.

The summary of the documents was prepared by Damian Collins, chairman of the House of Commons Digital, Media, Culture and Sport Committee.

“It is not clear that there was any user consent for this, nor how Facebook decided which companies should be whitelisted or not,” the report states.


In response, Facebook $FB has denied that it sold user data. A spokesperson for Facebook told Yahoo Finance, “As we’ve said many times, the documents Six4Three gathered for their baseless case are only part of the story and are presented in a way that is very misleading without additional context. We stand by the platform changes we made in 2015 to stop a person from sharing their friends’ data with developers. Like any business, we had many internal conversations about the various ways we could build a sustainable business model for our platform. But the facts are clear: we’ve never sold people’s data.”

0no comment


At SprinkleBit, founded in 2011, we believe that if you have a dollar, then you have what it takes to be an investor. Sometimes you just need a little extra help to build your confidence. With our virtual simulator and our 24 free SprinkleBit University chapters, you will be able to learn the ins and outs of the market risk-free. Once you're ready to dive into the real thing, the community will be right there with you to help you on your journey. Dive in and start taking control of your financial future. You won't regret it.

Leave a Reply